Appeal No. 2002-0538 Application 09/220,468 outer shroud of the compressor section substantially adjacent to one row of rotating blades and in fluid communication with the turbine section for extracting air from the tip clearance of the blades to be routed to the turbine section to increase stability of the engine. Although Uehling does not specify the nature of the interface between the compressor 14 and the pipe 24, it is not disputed that this interface must include at least one opening in the shroud (housing 12). Uehling’s Figure 3, which shows bypass pipe 24 communicating with the compressor 14 through the shroud at a position adjacent the tip clearance area of a row of rotating blades, belies the appellant’s argument that “Uehling does not teach that the bleed air is extracted through an opening that is substantially adjacent to a row of rotating blades” (main brief, page 7). Although patent drawings are not working drawings, things shown clearly therein are not to be disregarded, even if unexplained by the specification. In re Mraz, 455 F.2d 1069, 1072, 173 USPQ 25, 27 (CCPA 1972). Due to its position, Uehling’s opening(s) would necessarily extract air from the tip clearance area of the rotating blades, and the resulting reduction in tip clearance leakage would inherently increase the stability of the engine to the same extent that the extraction of 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007