Appeal No. 2002-0584 Application 08/321,028 VI. Claims 2 and 13 Claims 2 and 13 depend from independent claims 1 and 12, respectively, and contain limitations similar to those in independent claim 10 relating to the determination of valve energizing time independently of angular measurements associated with an engine crankshaft. For the reasons expressed above in connection with claim 10, the combined teachings of Weisman and Takeuchi would not have suggested this subject matter. Accordingly, we shall not sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 2 and 13 as being unpatentable over Weisman in view of Takeuchi. VII. Claims 5, 15 and 23 Claims 5, 15 and 23 depend ultimately from independent claims 1, 12 and 11, respectively, and pertain to the determination of a desired injection pressure based on desired engine torque and engine speed. As indicated above, Takeuchi discloses the determination of a desired injection pressure based on, among other parameters, engine speed. Given the importance placed by Weisman on desired engine torque as an engine operating parameter, the combined teachings of these references, applied as 12Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007