Appeal No. 2002-0584 Application 08/321,028 Claims 8, 17 and 25 depend ultimately from claims 1, 12 and 11, respectively, and pertain to the determination of engine temperature and the modification of the desired injection pressure based the engine temperature. Takeuchi’s disclosure of controlling injection pressure based on, among other parameters, cooling water temperature (see column 6, lines 52 through 68), considered within the context of the combined teachings of Weisman and Takeuchi as applied above, would have suggested this subject matter. Thus, we shall sustain the standing 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) rejection of claims 8, 17 and 25 as being unpatentable over Weisman in view of Takeuchi. X. Claim 21 Claim 21 depends ultimately from claim 1 and pertains to the determination of rail pressure in a fuel rail connected to the fuel injector, and the generation of an output signal for controlling the fuel pump system based on the difference between the desired injection pressure and the rail pressure. Takeuchi’s disclosure of the feedback control of rail pressure to obtain an optimum fuel injection pressure (see Figure 4 and column 6, lines 52 through 68), considered within the context of the combined 14Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007