Appeal No. 2002-0612 Application No. 09/254,631 It does not necessarily flow from the disclosure of Arnold at column 2, lines 44-46, that the head 53 is secured to the casing by screws that the housing parts 20, 53 are tightened in such a way that the end faces of the unnumbered element provide a sealing function. To provide such a sealing function, the axial dimension of the unnumbered element would have to be precisely sized relative to the adjacent shoulders formed in the outlet passage by the joining of the housing parts. Whether this is the case in Arnold cannot be determined from the drawings alone, in our view. Accordingly, we cannot agree with the examiner that Arnold meets these claim limitations. The Pierce reference, additionally applied against claim 17 for its alleged suggestion of placing the upper end of the outlet passage 60 in housing part 20 of Arnold in axial alignment with the lower end of the passageway of the sealing element, does not make up for the deficiencies of Arnold discussed above. In particular, in Pierce it is the tapered sides of the bushing, rather then the ends thereof, that function to seal the passageway. 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007