Appeal No. 2002-0612 Application No. 09/254,631 end face 38 of expansion sleeve 12 function to form a “hard seal” with the adjacent shoulder 28 of the passage. We therefore also cannot sustain the standing rejection of claims 21-30 as being unpatentable over Arnold in view of Pierce and Lee. III. Conclusion. Each of the examiner’s rejections is reversed. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOHN P. McQUADE ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) JENNIFER D. BAHR ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ljs/vsh 8Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007