Appeal No. 2002-0695 Application No. 09/132,731 We have sustained the rejection of claims 1-42 under obviousness-type double patenting but we have not sustained the rejection of claims 1-9, 15-24 and 30-37 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. Accordingly, the examiner’s decision is affirmed. No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a). AFFIRMED ERROL A. KRASS ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) HOWARD B. BLANKENSHIP ) Administrative Patent Judge ) eak/vsh 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007