Appeal No. 2002-0911 Page 15
Application No. 09/272,115
(5) sustained the rejection of claims 5, 6 and 9 as being anticipated by Becker;
(6) sustained the rejection of claims 5 and 9 as being anticipated by Newell;
(7) reversed the rejection of claims 5-7 as being anticipated by Andersson;
(8) sustained the rejection of claims 5, 6 and 9 as being unpatentable over Morrow; and
(9) sustained the rejection of claims 1-4, 7 and 8 as being unpatentable over Walker as
to claims 1, 2, 4, 7 and 8 and reversed the rejection as to claim 3.
No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with this appeal
may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).
AFFIRMED-IN-PART
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007