The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 26
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte YUKIO MIYA, OSAMU SUGIYAMA, RYOTA KOIKE,
TASKASHI TOIDA, SOSAKU KIMURA and KUNIHIKO KOKUBO
____________
Appeal No. 2002-0912
Application No. 08/913,187
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before COHEN, ABRAMS, and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
ABRAMS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1 and
3-9. Claims 10-33 have been withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-
elected invention, and claim 2 has been canceled.
We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007