Appeal No. 2002-1145 Page 6
Application No. 09/335,471
For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 12,
and claim 13 dependent thereon, under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.4
CONCLUSION
To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims 12 and 13 under
35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
CHARLES E. FRANKFORT )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JEFFREY V. NASE ) APPEALS
Administrative Patent Judge ) AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
)
JENNIFER D. BAHR )
Administrative Patent Judge )
4 We have also reviewed the reference to Picot additionally applied in the rejection of claim 13
(dependent on claim 12) but find nothing therein which makes up for the deficiencies of the AAPA and
Kellogg discussed above regarding claim 12.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007