Ex Parte MITUSINA et al - Page 2




            Appeal No. 2002-1487                                                          Page 2              
            Application No. 09/404,461                                                                        


                                               BACKGROUND                                                     
                   The appellants' invention relates to surgical cutting instruments (specification, p.       
            1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is set forth in the appendix to the appellants'            
            brief.                                                                                            


                   The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the            
            appealed claims are:                                                                              
            Trott                            4,646,738                       March 3, 1987                    
            Krause et al. (Krause)           5,152,744                       October 6, 1992                  



                   Claims 1 to 3, 5 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                   
            anticipated by Trott.                                                                             


                   Claims 4 and 11 to 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being                        
            unpatentable over Trott.                                                                          


                   Claims 1 to 13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over             
            Trott in view of Krause.                                                                          











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007