Ex Parte REEDY - Page 16




              Appeal No. 2002-1645                                                               Page 16                
              Application No. 09/281,553                                                                                


              open ended rectangular rear frame 10 which is bent at radius 17 to form to rear legs 24                   
              and 25.  The top of rear frame 10 is bent away from the patient.  An open ended                           
              rectangular frame bar 18 connects to front legs 20 and 21 by slightly angulated T-joints                  
              42 and 43 and to the rear frame 10 by screws or plastic bonds providing structural                        
              strength.  The upper horizontal segment of rear frame 10 constitutes the rear upper                       
              cross member of the walker structure.  The rear segment of frame bar 18 between rear                      
              legs 24 and 25 constitutes the rear lower cross member of the walker structure.  A                        
              U-shaped bar 19 bridges the rear legs 24 and 25 and the lower bar 18, it is connected                     
              by screw or plastic bond at each contact site.  Front legs 20 and 21 connect to side                      
              frames 8 and 9 by T-joints 40 and 41.  Handles 12 and 13 extend up and in from side                       
              bars 8 and 9.                                                                                             


                     Claim 12 (reproduced above) is not met by Sorrell.  Specifically, the claimed                      
              back portion defining a back opening shaped to permit wheelchair access into the                          
              interior space so that a wheelchair can be at least partially introduced into the interior                
              space through the back opening to receive the patient for removal from the interior                       
              space is not taught by Sorrell.  From the cryptic rejection of this claim (answer, p. 5), it              
              appears that the examiner believes that this back opening limitation is met by Sorrell's                  
              rear frame 10.  We do not agree.  The presence of the rear segment of frame bar 18                        
              between rear legs 24 and 25, the U-shaped bar 19 which bridges the rear legs 24 and                       








Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007