Appeal No. 2002-1645 Page 17 Application No. 09/281,553 25 and the seat 5 would prevent any wheelchair from being introduced into the interior space through the opening defined by Sorrell's open ended rectangular rear frame 10 which is bent at radius 17 to form to rear legs 24 and 25. Accordingly, the subject matter of claim 12 is not met by Sorrell. For the reasons set forth above, the decision of the examiner to reject claim 12, and claims 13 to 15 dependent thereon, under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by Sorrell is reversed. The anticipation rejection based on Haruyama We sustain the rejection of claims 1, 2, 5 and 10 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as being anticipated by Haruyama. Haruyama's invention relates to a walker used to help a handicapped person having difficulty in walking while supporting his or her body. An embodiment of Haruyama's walker is shown in Figures 1, 2 and 5. The walker comprises a pair of right and left leg members 1, and a support member 2 mounted on top of the leg members 1. Each leg member 1 comprises a wheel carriage 3 carrying a front wheel 4 pivotable about a vertical shaft 6, and a rear wheel 5, and two legs 7 vertically extending from the inner side of the wheel carriage 3. The support member 2 comprises a pair of right andPage: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007