Ex Parte BURNSIDE et al - Page 2




              Appeal No. 2002-1671                                                                     Page 2                 
              Application No. 08/993,985                                                                                      


                                                      BACKGROUND                                                              
                      The appellants' invention relates generally to implantable, radially expandable                         
              medical prostheses which are referred to as stent-grafts.  In particular, the invention is a                    
              self-expanding stent-graft having a bioabsorbable structural component and a                                    
              permanent graft component (specification, p. 1).  A copy of the claims under appeal is                          
              set forth in the appendix to the appellants' brief.                                                             


                      The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the                         
              appealed claims are:                                                                                            
              Kawai et al. (Kawai)                         4,950,258                    Aug. 21, 1990                         
              Berg et al. (Berg)                           5,464,650                    Nov. 7, 1995                          
              Fontaine et al. (Fontaine)                   5,527,354                    June 18, 1996                         
              Chaikof et al. (Chaikof)                     5,741,325                    Apr. 21, 1998                         



                      Claims 1 to 4, 6, 8 to 16, 19 to 21, 36, 37, 39 to 49 and 51 to 67 stand rejected                       
              under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Chaikof in view of Berg.                                       


                      Claims 1 to 4, 6, 8 to 16, 19 to 21, 36, 37, 39 to 49 and 51 to 67 stand rejected                       
              under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Kawai in view of Fontaine.                                     











Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007