Ex Parte SCHEUBER et al - Page 14




         Appeal No. 2002-2125                                                       
         Application No. 09/078,914                                                 
              Finally, the exhibits are unaccompanied by a statement in the         
         form of a declaration containing information about the provenance          
         or properties of the examples.  Accordingly, we give the exhibits          
         little probative weight.  Although a useful illustrative tool, on          
         balance, they are insufficient to overcome the prima facie case of         
         obviousness.                                                               
                                 Summary of Decision                                
              The rejection of claims 5-8, 11, and 19-23 under 35 U.S.C.            
         § 103(a) as obvious over Doane in view of Jackson and Popat is             
         sustained as to claims 5-8, 11, and 20-23, and reversed as to              
         claim 19.                                                                  
              No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection         
         with this appeal may be extended under 37 CFR § 1.136(a).                  
                                                                                   
                                   AFFIRMED-IN-PART                                 



                        PETER F. KRATZ               )                             
                        Administrative Patent Judge )                               
                                                      )                             
                                                      )                             
                                                      ) BOARD OF PATENT             
                        ROMULO H. DELMENDO            )                             
                        Administrative Patent Judge )   APPEALS AND                 
                                                      )                             
                                                      ) INTERFERENCES               
                                                      )                             
                        JAMES T. MOORE               )                             
                        Administrative Patent Judge )                               
                                         14                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007