Ex Parte MUFFOLETTO et al - Page 3




               Appeal No. 2002-2221                                                                                                   
               Application No. 08/847,946                                                                                             

                       a) providing a substrate having an electrically insulating native oxide layer on                               
                       a surface thereof, said substrate being of a material operative for use as an                                  
                       electrode in a capacitor;                                                                                      
                       b) depositing on said native oxide layer a metal selected from the group                                       
                       consisting of Group IA and Group VIIIA metals;                                                                 
                       c) directing a high energy beam onto said deposited metal and said native                                      
                       oxide layer to intermix the deposited metal with the native oxide;                                             
                       d) controlling the depth of intermixing of the deposited metal with the native                                 
                       oxide so as not to affect the bulk structure of said substrate;                                                
                       e) whereby said native oxide layer is changed from being electrically                                          
                       insulating to being more electrically conductive; and                                                          
                       f) applying electrode material onto the native oxide layer so that the substrate                               
                       is usable as an electrode.                                                                                     
                                                        CITED PRIOR ART                                                               
                       As evidence of unpatentability, the Examiner relies on the following reference:                                
               Draper et al. (Draper)                        4,495,255                        Jan.  22, 1985                          
                       The Examiner rejected claims 1 to 12 as unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as                               
               obvious over Draper. (Answer, p. 3).2                                                                                  




                                                           DISCUSSION                                                                 

                           2 The Examiner has indicated that the rejection under 35 U.S.C. § 102 has been                             
                   withdrawn. (Answer, p. 2).                                                                                         
                                                                 -3-                                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007