Ex Parte ROSELLE et al - Page 2




          Appeal No. 2003-0234                                                        
          Application No. 09/446,202                                                  


                    1.  A method for treating food to reduce the level of             
          microorganisms on the surface of said food and make it safe to              
          eat, said method comprising treatment occurring just prior to               
          consumption, comprising the step of contacting the surface of               
          said food with an aqueous dilute treatment composition comprising           
          toxicologically-acceptable basic buffer to provide a pH of                  
          greater than about 10.5 and, optionally, toxicologically-                   
          acceptable detergent surfactant, for a period of time in excess             
          of about one half of a minute, the composition being essentially            
          free of any material that adversely affects safety or                       
          palatability, so that said food does not need to be rinsed before           
          consumption.                                                                

                                   THE REFERENCES                                     
          Murch et al. (Murch ‘295)         5,498,295         Mar. 12, 1996           
          Murch et al. (Murch ‘678)         5,849,678         Dec. 15, 1998           
                                   THE REJECTIONS                                     
               The claims stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows:            
          claims 1-13 and 15-21 over Murch ‘295, and claim 14 over                    
          Murch ‘295 in view of Murch ‘678.1                                          
                                       OPINION                                        
               We affirm the aforementioned rejections.  Because the                  
          examiner does not rely upon Murch ‘678 in the final rejection, we           
          denominate the affirmance of the rejection of claim 14 as                   
          involving a new ground of rejection.  Under the provisions of               



               1 In the event of further prosecution, the examiner and the appellants 
          should address whether there is adequate antecedent basis for “said base-   
          stable anionic surfactant” in claim 14.                                     
                                       Page 2                                         





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007