Interference No. 104,313
Sauer Inc. v. Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg. Co., Ltd.
9. Sauer has been accorded the benefit of the earlier filing dates of applications
07/706,279; 07/482,656; and 07/319,164. The earliest of such filing dates is March 3, 1989.
10. Kanzaki has been accorded benefit of the earlier filing dates of Japanese
applications 63-24193; 63-55828; 63-67005; and 63-79665. The earliest of such filing dates is
February 3, 1988.
11. On June 29, 1987, representatives from Sauer and representatives from Kanzaki had
a personal meeting in the United States. At that meeting, it was generally agreed between the
respective company representatives that the two parties will work jointly to develop a rear engine
rider package including an IHT (integrated hydrostatic transmission). (Exhibit 2228; Exhibit
241118; Exhibit 2412 13; Exhibit 2413 13; Exhibit 2407 17).
12. It was also agreed during the June 29, 1987, meeting that Mr. Joseph Louis of
Sauer and Mr. Koichiro Fujisaki of Kanzaki would be responsible for the conceptual design of
the IHT. (Exhibit 2228; Exhibit 2411 ý 9; Exhibit 2412 14; Exhibit 2413 14; Exhibit 2407 T 8).
13. Neither party represents that the agreement reached on June 29, 1987, to jointly
develop a rear engine rider including an IHT was itself a binding contract with enforceable terms.
Neither party represents that the agreement was in writing and neither party submitted a
summary of each party's specific responsibilities, obligations, and commitments under the
agreement. On page 46 of its brief, Sauer states that the parties were jointly developing an IHT
pursuant to "what was going to be" a contractual joint venture. We find that the so called
- 4 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007