Ex Parte JOHNSON - Page 16




             Interference No. 104,314                                                                                     
             Sauer Inc. v. Kanzaki Kokyukoki Mfg. Co., Ltd.                                                               

             leg by the reference numeral 73. By that scheme, the first surface of the second leg is hidden               
             from view and located on the bottom of the second leg 75. Clearly, the first surface of the                  
             second leg does not extend at right angles away from the first surface of the first leg as is                
             required by the count. What Sauer labels as a right angle does not refer to the right surfaces.              
                    Two surfaces cannot form a right angle relative to each other unless they intersect over at           
             least a line segment. Here, as is designated by Sauer in Exhibit 2224, the first surface of the first        
             leg and the first surface of the second leg intersect, if at all, at most only at a point. It is evident     
             from the upper right hand figure in Exhibit 2224 that the first surface 72 of the first leg 74 and           
             the first surface (on the bottom and hidden from view) of the second leg are not sufficiently                
             related in positioning to be meaningfully characterized as having the former extending away                  
             from the latter at a right angle. Sauer in its brief offers no explanation whatsoever as to why it is        
             that any figure in Exhibit 2224 should be read as revealing that the first surface of the second leg         
             extends at right angles away from the first surface of the second leg. We cannot locate even an              
             assertion in Sauer's brief to the effect that in the annotated figures of Exhibit 2224 the first             
             surface of the second leg extends at right angles away from the first surface of the first leg. The          
             first surface of the second leg is not even labeled with any reference numeral. It is apparent that          
             Sauer has neglected to account for this aspect of the subject matter of the count.                           
                    Additionally, we further find that the structure disclosed in the upper right hand figure of          
             Exhibit 2224 is not generally L-shaped as is required by the count. While both Mr. Joseph Louis              
             and Mr. Alan Johnson in their respective declarations refer to the structure shown in the upper              

                                                         - 16 -                                                           






Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007