BELLEAU et al. V. CHENG et al. - Page 9





                                                                                                             Interference No. 104,396                           
                                                                                                                                   Page 9                       


                             It is:                                                                                                                             

                             ORDERED that Chdng's Amendment to Cancel Dependent Claim 224 and Rewrite it as                                                     
                    Independent Claim 225 (Paper No. 239) will be entered into Cheng's involved U.S. Application                                                
                   No. 08/463,960.                                                                                                                              

                            FURTHER ORDERED that Junior Party Cheng is not entitled to a patent containing                                                      

                   claims 37-39,41,43, 45-47,49, 51, 52, 54-56, 58-60, 62-64, 66, 72, 74-78, 84, 86-90, 96, 98                                                  
                   102, 105, 107, 108, 111, 113, 114, 120, 122-126, 132, 134-138, 144, 146-150 and I ŭ2-223 and                                                 
                   225 of Cheng's involved U.S. Application No. 08/463,960.                                                                                     

                            FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this final decision shall be placed and given a                                                      
                  paper number in the file of Belleau et al., U.S. Patent No. 5,532,246, Belleau et'al., U.S.                                                   
                  Application 09/585,431 and Cheng, U.S. Application No. 08/463,960.                                                                            

                            FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement, attention is directed to                                                   
                  35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661.                                                                                                        


                                    FRED E. McKELVEY                                                                                                            
                                    Senior Administrative Patent Judge                                                                                          


                                                                                                    BOARD OF PATENT                                             
                                   ZSALLVŭARDNER-LANE APPEALS                                                                                                   
                                    Administrative Patent Judge AND                                                                                             
                                                                                                    INTERFERENCES                                               

                                                      TIERNEŭ"--77                                                                                              
                                    MICHAEL P.                                                                                                                  
                                    Administrative Patent Judge                                                                                                 









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007