(4) fail to demonstrate that.the "first circuit diagram" does not
provide a written description of the count. As stated above,
Yamada does not argue that the "first circuit diagram" does not
describe the count. Yamada does not argue that the components
shown in the "first circuit diagram" are not what they appear to
be.
Not every single paragraph or separate note within the four
corners of Chern's Invention Disclosure must describe the same
circuit, or describe the elements of the count. All that is
necessary is that somewhere within the document there exists a
description for at least one embodiment of the subject matter of
the count. Accordingly, we need not and have not considered each
additional argument made regarding items (l)-(4).
Yamada argues that the affidavits that Chern has submitted
fail to explain with particularity the Invention Disclosure as
required by Rule 671(f) (Paper 28 at 22).
Wen-Foo Chern indicates that he made the drawing that is
attached and a pa rt of the Invention Disclosure (Findings 24, 33
and 34). Trent indicates that he read and understood the
Invention Disclosure (Finding 30). Trent further states that the
Invention Disclosure he saw included the drawing that is part of
Chern Ex. 2002 (Findings 31 and 32).
While Wen-Foo Chern does not describe how each element of
the count relates to the elements in, for exýiaple, the "fii ý.
circuit diagram", he does state that the drawing demonstrates
19 -
Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007