Interference No. 104,649 Page No. 12 jr 42 43' 11 50 6 P 53 53' t44 42 ^48 52 5352 43 49 48 4V 45 Point U& Source FIG. 6 Keagy '969 provides the following description of the ray diagram of Figure 6: In FIG. 6, rays 42 and 43 emanate from a point light source 45 at angles such that they pass through the bottom surface 44 of the plastic platen 46 and reach the upper interface surface 50. These rays 42 and 43 happen to fall upon points on upper surface 50 in contact with ridges of a finger, and escape the platen and are lost as rays 42' and 43'. In contrast, rays 52 and 53 reach the top surface and impinge upon air in the valleys between fingerprint ridges, and are jpLally internally reflected. Their reflected versions, 53' and 52', form part of the white portions of a working image of the user's fingerprint. Rays 52' and 53' are refracted toward the imaging apparatus (not shown) because of the difference in indices of refraction between the flesh in a fingerprint ridge and air. (Keagy '969, col. 7, line 57 to col. 8, line 3). Keagy's description of Figure 6 is confusing in that it appears to use the terms reflected and refracted to describe the same phenomenon. F22. Keagy's description of rays that bounce off the upper surface of the platen in Figures 3 (31, 33 and 35) and 6 52' and 53') is inconsistent with the description of similar rays in Figures 5 (3a and 4a) and 7A and 7B. Although inconsistent in the specification, one skilled in the artPage: Previous 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007