Interference No. 104,657
Sosnowski v. Spies
On February 1, 2002, junior party Sosnowski filed a paper
entitled “CONCESSION OF PRIORITY BY JUNIOR PARTY SOSNOWSKI.”
In that paper (Paper No. 38), junior party concedes priority as
to the subject matter of the count and acknowledges the
concession as a request for entry of adverse judgment.
On the morning of February 6, 2002, a conference call was
held between administrative patent judge Jameson Lee and
respective counsel for the parties, Mr. Ronald E. Brown
representing the junior party and Mr. William G. Gosz
representing the senior party. During the conference, the
parties were asked by the APJ whether they desired review at
final hearing of any interlocutory decision entered thus far in
the interference, in particular the denial of junior party’s
preliminary motion 1 on November 1, 2001. Counsel for the
parties, William G. Gosz representing senior party and Ronald E.
Brown representing junior party, indicated that there is no
interlocutory decision for which they would like to seek review
at a final hearing. Accordingly, it is now time appropriate for
entry of judgment.
It is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of the count
is herein entered against junior party ANTHONY M. SOSNOWSKI;
- 2 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007