Interference No. 104,657
Sosnowski v. Spies
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party ANTHONY M. SOSNOWSKI is
not entitled to a patent containing its claims 1-13 which
correspond to Count 1;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this communication will be
placed in the respective files of the parties’ involved
application or patent; and
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement,
attention should be directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR
§ 1.666.
JAMESON LEE )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
SALLY GARDNER-LANE ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
SALLY C. MEDLEY )
Administrative Patent Judge )
- 3 -
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007