The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper 68 Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Filed Washington, D.C. 20231 26 March 2002 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ MYUN KI HAN, S. PAUL LEE and JACK G. CHIRKJIAN, Junior Party, (Application 09/069,847), v. KENNETH J. LIVAK, SUSAN J.A. FLOOD and JEFFREY MARMARO, Senior Party (Patent 5,538,848). _______________ Patent Interference 104,670 (CAS) _______________ Before: McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge , and SPIEGEL and GARDNER-LANE, Administrative Patent Judges. McKELVEY, Senior Administrative Patent Judge . FINAL DECISION In this interference, Livak successfully dodged an attack on its patent. However, Livak declines to quietly walk away happy that its patent is still intact. Instead, Livak invites us to look into allegations that certain claims in the Han application are unpatentable. Livak further invites us to take other actionPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007