Interference No. 104,681
Spears v. Holland
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of
the count is herein entered against senior party DAVID E. HOLLAND
and GAVIN W. SCHUTZ, who are not entitled to a patent containing
their application claims 21 and 22 which correspond to the
count;"
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper will be given a
paper number and entered in the involved application or patent of
the respective parties; and
FURTHER ORDERED that failure to file a copy of any agreement
regarding the termination of this proceeding may render the
agreement and any resulting patents unenforceable. See section
135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661 for more details.
Claims 21 and 22 of Holland, the only claims of the
senior party corresponding to the count, have been determined as
unpatentable over prior art.
33 -
Page: Previous 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007