Interference No. 104,693 Preputnick v. Provencher Weber patent) discloses use of complementary fastening portions on modules or half-modules to secure two modules or half-modules together. We note, in particular, the Kachlic patent, which discloses a corresponding notch and recess on contiguous modules which are each attached to a common housing. The notch and recess form complementary fastening portions on modules, which engage each other to secure the modules together. As is stated in the Kachlic patent in column 8, lines 59-68: Specifically, as seen in FIGS. 9 and 10, one side of each encasement 110 is provided with a projecting boss 124 and the opposite side of each encasement is provided with a complementarily shaped indented recess 126 (FIG. 10). The bosses and detents are rectangularly shaped such that when the terminal modules are juxtaposed in their side-by-side relationship, the bosses of the modules project into the recesses of adjacent modules, thereby locking all the modules together. Since modules 1 and 2 of Hashiguchi are inserted into the housing in a mutually superposed state and remain superposed in a contiguous relationship with the housing, Kachlic's teachings about complementary fastening portions on contiguous modules within a common housing provides motivation for doing the same with Hashiguchi's modules 1 and 2. A prima facie case of obviousness has been made with respect to Provencher's claim 17. Provencher responds by arguing that Hashiguchi actually teaches away from the step of securing the first and second modules together by engaging complementary fastening portions. - 32Page: Previous 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007