PREPUTNICK et al. V. PROVENCHER et al. - Page 32





          Interference No. 104,693                                                           
          Preputnick v. Provencher                                                           
          Weber patent) discloses use of complementary fastening portions                    
          on modules or half-modules to secure two modules or half-modules                   
          together. We note, in particular, the Kachlic patent, which                        
          discloses a corresponding notch and recess on contiguous modules                   
          which are each attached to a common housing. The notch and                         
          recess form complementary fastening portions on modules, which                     
          engage each other to secure the modules together. As is stated                     
          in the Kachlic patent in column 8, lines 59-68:                                    
               Specifically, as seen in FIGS. 9 and 10, one side of                          
               each encasement 110 is provided with a projecting boss                        
               124 and the opposite side of each encasement is                               
               provided with a complementarily shaped indented recess                        
               126 (FIG. 10). The bosses and detents are                                     
               rectangularly shaped such that when the terminal                              
               modules are juxtaposed in their side-by-side                                  
               relationship, the bosses of the modules project into                          
               the recesses of adjacent modules, thereby locking all                         
               the modules together.                                                         
               Since modules 1 and 2 of Hashiguchi are inserted into the                     
          housing in a mutually superposed state and remain superposed in a                  
          contiguous relationship with the housing, Kachlic's teachings                      
          about complementary fastening portions on contiguous modules                       
          within a common housing provides motivation for doing the same                     
          with Hashiguchi's modules 1 and 2. A prima facie case of                           
          obviousness has been made with respect to Provencher's claim 17.                   
               Provencher responds by arguing that Hashiguchi actually                       
          teaches away from the step of securing the first and second                        
          modules together by engaging complementary fastening portions.                     
                                          - 32                                               








Page:  Previous  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007