Interference No. 104,693
Preputnick v. Provencher
Judqmen
It is
ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of the count
is herein entered against junior party GEORGE PREPUTNICK, JAMES
LEE FEDDER, SCOTT K. MICKIEVICZ, and RICHARD N. WHYNE;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party GEORGE PREPUTNICK, JAMES
LEE FEDDER, SCOTT K. MICKIEVICZ, and RICHARD N. WHYNE are not
entitled to their patent claims 9-14 which correspond to the
count;
FURTHER ORDERED that judgment as to the subject matter of
the count is herein entered against senior party DANIEL B.
PROVENCHER and PHILIP T. STOKOE;
FURTHER ORDERED that senior party DANIEL B. PROVENCHER and
PHILIP T. STOKOE are not entitled to their application claims 17
19 which correspond to the count;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper will be entered in
the involved application or patent file of the respective
parties; and
FURTHER ORDERED that if there is an agreement between the
parties facilitating or leading toward the termination of this
interference, the parties' attention is directed to 35 U.S.C.
§ 1.135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661.
- 40 -
Page: Previous 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007