The opinion in support of the decision being
entered today is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper 17
Filed by: Trial Section Merits Panel
Box Interference Filed: May 2, 2602
Washington, D.C. 20231
Tel: 703-308-9797
Fax: 703-305-0942
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
ANDINTERFERENCES
IZUMU SAITO, YUMI KANEGAE MAILED"
and MICHIO NAKAI
MAY 2 - 202
Junior Party,
Patent 5,700,470 PAT. & T.M. OFFICE
BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
V.
IMIRE KOVESDI, DOUGLAS E. BROUGH,
DUNCAN L. MCVEY, JOSEPH T. BRUDER
and ALENA LIZONOVA
Senior Party
Application 08/258,416
Patent Interference No. 104,756 (CAS)
;Before: SCHAFER, TORCZON and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges.
SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judge.
JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662(a)
"Pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.662(a), the party Saito hereby abandons the contest
as to Count 1 and claims 1-6 corresponding thereto" (Paper 16). Therefore, it is
Page: 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007