Interference No. 104,756 Paper 17
Saito v. Kosvedi Page 2
ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 1, p. 5), the sole count
in the interference, is awarded against junior party IZUMU SAITO, YUMI KANEGAE
and MICHIO NAKAI;
FURTHER ORDERED that junior party IZUMU SAITO, YUMI KANEGAE and
MICHIO NAKAI is not entitled to a patent containing claims 1-6 (corresponding to Count
1) of Saito U.S. Patent 5,700,470, issued December 23, 1997, based on application
08/615,048, filed March 12, 1996;
FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in files
of U.S. Patent 5,700,470 and U.S. application 08/258,416;'
FURTHER ORDERED that if thet-6 is a settlement agreement which has not
been filed, attention is directed to 35 U.S'.C. § 135(c) and 3"7 CFR § 1.661; and
FURTHER ORDERED that the telephone conference call scheduled for May 3,
2002 is cancelled.
'kICHARD E. SCHAFE
Administrative Patent Judge
/Of
zgı ı z BOARD OF PATENT
PICHARD To N APPEALS AND
Administrative Patent Te INTERFERENCES
CAROL A. 9PIEGEL
Administrative Patent Judge
Page: Previous 1 2 3 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007