The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper2l By: Trial Section Merits Panel Box Interference Washington, D.C. 20231 Filed: December 11, 2002 Tel: 703-308-9797 Fax: 703-305-0942 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS ANDINTERFERENCES (Administrative Patent Judge Carol A. Spiegel) MILTON ZAITLIN and MAILED PETER PALUKAITIS I Junior party, DEC 12 20OZ U.S. Patent 5,633,449 PAT. & T.M. OFFICE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS U.S. Patent 5,945,581 AND INTERFERENCES V. CARL JOSEPH BRAUN, III, CYNTHIA LOU HEMENWAY and NILGUN EREKEN TUMER Senior party, Application 09/084,585 Patent Interference No. 105,030 Before: SCHAFER, LEE and SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judges. SPIEGEL, Administrative Patent Judq JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO 37 CFR § 1.662(a) Upon consideration of "BRAUN REQUEST FOR ADVERSE JUDGMENT"Page: 1 2 3 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007