ZAITLIN et al. V. ZAITLIN et al. V. Braun et al. - Page 2




             Interference No. 105,030 Paper20                                                                      
             Zaitlin v. Braun Page 2                                                                               
             (Paper 19), it is                                                                                     
                    ORDERED that judgment on priority as to Count 1 (Paper 1, page 6), the sole                    
             count in the interference, is awarded against senior party CARL JOSEPH BRAUN, 111,                    
             CYNTHIA LOU HEMENWAY and NILGUN EREKEN TUMER (Braun);                                                 
                    FURTHER ORDERED that senior party CARL JOSEPH BRAUN, 111, CYNTHIA                              
             LOU HEMENWAY and NILGUN EREKEN TUMER (Braun) is not entitled to a patent                              
             containing claims 3-5, 7, 9, 10, 15-28 and 30 (corresponding to Count 1) of U.S.                      
             application 09/084,585, filed May 26, 1998, as a continuation of U.S. Patent 5,773,701,               
             issued June 30, 1998, based on U.S. application 08/803,973, filed February 21, 1997,                  
             as a continuation of U.S. application 07/804,862, filed December 6, 1991, as a                        
             continuation of U.S. application 07/7712,912, filed October 4, 1991;                                  
                    FURTHER ORDERED that a copy of this paper shall be made of record in files                     
             of U.S. application 09/084,585 and of U.S. Patents 5,633,449 and 5,945,581; and                       
                    FURTHER ORDERED that if there is a settlement agreement which has not                          
             been filed, attention is further directed to 35 U.S.C. § 135(c) and 37 CFR § 1.661.                   



                                               RICHARD E. SCHAFER1% )                                              
                                               Ad istrative atent Ju ge )                                          

                                                                            BOARD OF PATENT                        
                                              ,,d*ESON LEE APPEALS AND                                             
                                              ưAd/ministrative Patent Judge INTERFERENCES                          


                                               CAROL A. 9FMEGCL                                                    
                                               Administrative Patent Judge                                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007