Appeal No. 1996-3670 Page 16 Application No. 08/217,063 l. 67 - col. 16, l. 3. Therefore, we affirm the rejection of claim 7 as obvious. CONCLUSION In summary, the rejections of claims 1 and 3-7 under § 112, ¶ 2; claims 1-7 under § 112, ¶ 1; and claims 1-6 under § 103(a) are reversed. In contrast, the rejections of claim 2 under § 112, ¶ 2 and claim 7 under § 103(a) are affirmed. Our affirmances are based only on the arguments made in the briefs. Arguments not made therein are neither before us nor at issue but are considered waived. No time for taking any action connected with this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a).Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007