Ex parte OGREN - Page 1




             The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
                    for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.        

                                                                 Paper No. 32         

                       UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                     ____________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                          
                                   AND INTERFERENCES                                  
                                     ____________                                     
                                  Ex parte MATS OGREN                                 
                                     ____________                                     
                                 Appeal No. 1997-1373                                 
                              Application No. 08/478,811                              
                                     ____________                                     
                               HEARD: December 11, 2001                               
                                     ____________                                     
          Before HAIRSTON, RUGGIERO, and BARRY, Administrative Patent                 
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection              
          of claims 2-5 and 18.  Claims 1 and 6-17 were canceled earlier              
          in the prosecution.  An amendment filed November 27, 1995 after             
          final rejection was approved for entry by the Examiner as                   
          indicated in the Advisory Action dated December 14, 1995 (Paper             
          No. 24).  This amendment canceled claims 2-5 and 18 and added               
          new claims 19-23; however, the Examiner maintained that these               







Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007