Appeal No. 1997-1373
Application No. 08/478,811
between said plurality of particles and an acceptable level of
interference between said base stations.
No prior art references have been relied upon by the
Examiner.
Claims 19-23 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first
paragraph, as failing to provide an adequate disclosure.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, reference is made to the Brief (Paper No. 26) and
Answer (Paper No. 27) for the respective details.
OPINION
We have carefully considered the subject matter on appeal,
the rejection advanced by the Examiner, and the evidence and
arguments relied upon by the Examiner as support for the
rejection. We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into
consideration, in reaching our decision, Appellant’s arguments
set forth in the Brief along with the Examiner’s rationale in
support of the rejection and arguments in rebuttal set forth in
the Examiner’s Answer.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007