Ex Parte HENDERSON et al - Page 1




                               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written                       
                                       for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                               
                                                                                                     Paper No. 49               
                            UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                           
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                  BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                            
                                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                                              
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                Ex parte WALTER G. HENDERSON, WAYNE F. LARSON,                                                  
                                                   and PHILIP D. BARRETT                                                        
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                                    Appeal No. 1997-1632                                                        
                                                  Application No. 08/138,555                                                    
                                                         ____________                                                           
                                                           ON BRIEF                                                             
                                                         ____________                                                           
               Before THOMAS, MARTIN, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  
               BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                              


                                                   DECISION ON APPEAL                                                           
                      A patent examiner rejected claims 45-60 and 62-83.  The appellants appeal                                 
               therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a).  After twice remanding the appeal, we affirm-in-                             
               part.                                                                                                            


                                                       BACKGROUND                                                               
                      The appellants’ invention programs electronic real estate lockboxes and keys.  A                          
               real estate lockbox is a strong box housing a mechanical key to a house for sale.  A real                        
               estate agent uses an electronic “key” to open the lockbox and gain access to the house                           






Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007