Ex Parte DOI et al - Page 1





                           The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for             
                                     publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.                           
             Paper No. 45                                                                                             
                               UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                              
                                                    ____________                                                      
                                    BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                
                                               AND INTERFERENCES                                                      
                                                    ____________                                                      
                               Ex parte MITSUAKI DOI and MASATSUGU OKUYAMA                                            
                                                    ____________                                                      
                                                Appeal No. 1997-2656                                                  
                                              Application No. 07/907,472                                              
                                                    ____________                                                      
                                              On Request for Rehearing                                                
                                                    ____________                                                      
             Before JERRY SMITH, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.                                      
             DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                      


                                    DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING                                                 
                    This is a decision on a Request for Rehearing, filed Nov. 18, 2001, requesting                    
             rehearing of our decision, mailed Sep. 18, 2001 affirming the examiner’s rejection of                    
             claims 1-9.  Claims 10-12 were filed in an amendment filed with appellants’ reply brief in               
             response to a new ground of rejection, but we found no rejection of these claims.                        
             Therefore, claims 1-9 were before us on appeal in this application.                                      
                    We GRANT the Request for Rehearing and modify our decision to AFFIRM-IN-                          
             PART.                                                                                                    








Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007