The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 45 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte MITSUAKI DOI and MASATSUGU OKUYAMA ____________ Appeal No. 1997-2656 Application No. 07/907,472 ____________ On Request for Rehearing ____________ Before JERRY SMITH, DIXON, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges. DIXON, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING This is a decision on a Request for Rehearing, filed Nov. 18, 2001, requesting rehearing of our decision, mailed Sep. 18, 2001 affirming the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-9. Claims 10-12 were filed in an amendment filed with appellants’ reply brief in response to a new ground of rejection, but we found no rejection of these claims. Therefore, claims 1-9 were before us on appeal in this application. We GRANT the Request for Rehearing and modify our decision to AFFIRM-IN- PART.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007