Appeal No. 1997-2656 Application No. 07/907,472 The prior art reference of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is: Yoshida 5,208,681 May 4, 1993 (Effective filing date Mar. 8, 1988) APA - the background of the specification section and Figure 1 Claims 1-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over the combination of the admitted prior art in the preamble of the Jepson format claim, the admitted prior art in the specification and the Yoshida patent. Claim 9 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Yoshida alone. We sustained the examiner’s rejection of claims 1-9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over the combination of prior art, but reversed the examiner’s rejection under Yoshida alone in our decision, mailed Sep. 18, 2001. ON REQUEST FOR REHEARING This is in response to appellants' request for rehearing of our decision, mailed Nov. 18, 2001, wherein we affirmed the examiner's rejection of claims 1-9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We have carefully considered the arguments raised by appellants in the request for rehearing. Those arguments do persuade us that we overlooked or misapprehended appellants' arguments concerning the grouping of the claims, but the arguments do not persuade us that we overlooked or misapprehended any matter in our original consideration of the appeal of independent claims 1, 8 and 9. 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007