Appeal No. 1998-0828
Application 08/438,091
7. Claims 7 and 31 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the teachings of Mori in view of Chi
and Elliott.
8. Claims 15 and 16 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the teachings of Mori in view of Chi
and Nihei.
9. Claims 9 and 10 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the teachings of Mori in view of Chi
and Frandsen.
10. Claims 11-13 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over the teachings of Mori in view of Chi,
Frandsen and Imamura.
11. Claims 28 and 29 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103
as being unpatentable over the teachings of Mori in view of Chi1.
Rather than repeat the arguments of appellants or the
examiner, we make reference to the brief and the answer for the
respective details thereof.
1 This rejection was added as a new ground of rejection in
the examiner’s answer.
-4-
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007