The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 16 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte JON C. SCHAEFFER, RUSSELL L. MCCARRON and DENNIS M. GRAY ____________ Appeal No. 1998-2295 Application No. 08/435,902 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before WALTZ, LIEBERMAN and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges. JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Applicants appeal the decision of the Primary Examiner finally rejecting claims 1 to 4, 6 to 13 and 15 to 20.1 We have jurisdiction under 35 U.S.C. § 134. 1 The Examiner has indicated that the subject matter of claim 21 was allowable. However the claim has been objected to as depending on a rejected claim. (Final Rejection, p. 7).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007