Ex Parte PALMER et al - Page 3



          Appeal No. 1998-3126                                            3           
          Application No. 08/479,569                                                  


          support of the rejections, and to appellants’ brief (Paper No.              
          32, filed December 2, 1997) and reply brief (Paper No. 35, filed            
          March 26, 1998) for appellants’ arguments thereagainst.  Only               
          those arguments actually made by appellants have been considered            
          in this decision.  Arguments which appellants could have made but           
          chose not to make in the brief have not been considered.  See 37            
          CFR 1.192(a).                                                               
                                       OPINION                                        
               In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have carefully             
          considered the subject matter on appeal, the rejections advanced            
          by the examiner, and the evidence of obviousness relied upon by             
          the examiner as support for the rejections.  We have, likewise,             
          reviewed and taken into consideration, in reaching our decision,            
          appellants’ arguments set forth in the briefs along with the                
          examiner’s rationale in support of the rejections and arguments             
          in rebuttal set forth in the examiner’s answer.                             
               Upon consideration of the record before us, we affirm-in-              
          part.                                                                       










Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007