The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 14 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte GRIGORY SADKHIN ____________ Appeal No. 1999-0028 Application No. 08/513,610 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before COHEN, FRANKFORT, and NASE, Administrative Patent Judges. COHEN, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is an appeal from the final rejection of solely claims 12 and 16 through 19 (Paper No. 8). While the brief (page 3) indicates that an amendment after final is submitted herewith to cancel all pending claims not subject to appeal, in a telepone conversation with Pamela S. Bennett of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences on March 22, 1999, counsel for appellant indicated that the referenced amendment had not been filed. Therefore, the only claims before us on appealPage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007