Appeal No. 1999-0028
Application No. 08/513,610
in conjunction with any similar known comparison procedure
that may be uncovered by the examiner in searching the
respective fields of criminal investigation and security
practice wherein electrical signals encoding fingerprints,
palm prints, eye images, and face prints may have been
electronically compared with stored data.
In summary, this panel of the board has:
not sustained the rejection of claims 12 and 16 through
19 under 35 U.S.C. § 112, first paragraph, as being based upon
a
disclosure which lacks enablement; and
2(...continued)
appellant’s specification (page 1) and, in particular, the
content of the booklet “Iridology Simplified” referenced
therein (copy in application file).
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007