Ex parte HAYASHI - Page 1




               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not     
               written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.     

                                                            Paper No. 18              


                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                              Ex parte NOBUHIRO HAYASHI                               
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1999-0170                                  
                             Application No. 08/588,020                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before RUGGIERO, LALL, and BLANKENSHIP, Administrative Patent               
          Judges.                                                                     
          RUGGIERO, Administrative Patent Judge.                                      
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on the appeal from the final rejection              
          of claims 1-24.  An amendment filed January 8, 1998 after                   
          final rejection, which canceled claims 11, 12, 18, and 19, was              
          approved for entry by the Examiner.  Accordingly, the                       
          rejection of claims 1-10, 13-17, and 20-24 is before us on                  
          appeal.                                                                     
               The claimed invention relates to a data reproducing                    
          apparatus for reproducing data from a magnetic disk in which                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007