The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 22
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte ROBERT E. TOUHSAENT
____________
Appeal No. 1999-0203
Application No. 08/399,384
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before GARRIS, WALTZ, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges.
WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s refusal to allow claims 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, and 16
through 18, as amended subsequent to the final rejection. 1
1The amendment dated Oct. 27, 1997, Paper No. 14, was entered as per the Advisory Action
dated Nov. 18, 1997, Paper
No. 15. The amendment filed concurrently with the Brief, dated Jan. 20, 1998, Paper No. 18, has
been entered by the examiner although this entry is not confirmed in the record (see the Answer).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007