Appeal No. 1999-0541 Application No. 08/599,436 CONCLUSION In view of the foregoing, the decision of the Examiner rejecting claims 5, 7, 13, 15 through 18 and 22 through 26 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed. We make the following new ground of rejection for claim 5 13 under 35 U.S.C. § 102 as anticipated by Levine pursuant to 37 CFR § 1.196(b). We only consider independent claim 13 but encourage the Examiner to consider other claims for possible rejections under Levine alone or in combination with other prior art. Claim 13 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(e) as anticipated by Levine. Levine teaches in figures 2 and 3, a field emission device including a cathode (emitter plate 12) and a face plate screen (anode plate 40) as recited in Appellants’ claim 13. Levine specifically teaches an anode plate comprising “a substrate” as layer 42 and “a conductive layer formed over the substrate” as layer 46 (col. 5, lines 35-39). Levine further teaches “phosphors formed on the conductive layer” as regionsPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007