Ex Parte RAAB - Page 2



          Appeal No. 1999-0594                                                        
          Application No. 08/434,010                                                  

          (1) attaching the measurement arm of a passive three                        
          dimensional coordinate measuring machine (CMM) having multiple              
          degrees of freedom to a multi-axis device and operating the CMM             
          through a selected 3-dimensional path or operation which emulates           
          the desired preselected programmed path or operation of the                 
          multi-axis device;                                                          
          (2) developing 3-dimensional data of at least one of (a)                    
          position and (b) orientation from step (1) and storing said data,           
          said data defining the actual path or operation of the multi-axis           
          device;                                                                     
          (3) comparing the actual path or operation to the desired                   
          preselected programmed path or operation;                                   
          (4) generating an error map comparing the actual path or                    
          operation to the desired preselected programmed path or                     
          operation; and                                                              
          (5) using said error map to improve the repeatability and/or                
          precision of the multi-axis device.                                         
          The references relied upon by the examiner are:                             
          Vold                          4,937,759         Jun. 26, 1990               
          Taylor et al. (Taylor)        5,007,006         Apr. 09, 1991               
          Chapman et al. (Chapman)      5,259,120         Nov. 09, 1993               
          Claims 1-9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                 
          unpatentable over Taylor in view of Chapman and Vold.                       
          The respective positions of the examiner and the appellant                  
          with regard to the propriety of these rejections are set forth in           
          the final rejection and the examiner’s answer (Paper Nos. 10 and            
          14, respectively) and the appellant’s brief (Paper No. 13).                 
          Appellant’s Invention                                                       
          The invention is described at pages 2 and 3 of the brief.                   
                                         -2–                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007