Ex Parte MILLER et al - Page 1



            The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not       
            written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.       
                                                            Paper No. 20             

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                      
                                    _____________                                    
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                         
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                    
                          Ex parte THOMAS LAWRENCE MILLER,                           
                              RICHARD FRANCIS NELSON,                                
                                        and                                          
                                 JOHN KEITH OSTROM                                   
                                    _____________                                    
                                Appeal No. 1999-0752                                 
                             Application No. 08/806,103                              
                                   ______________                                    
                                      ON BRIEF                                       
                                   _______________                                   
          Before KIMLIN, PAK, and JEFFREY T. SMITH, Administrative Patent            
          Judges.                                                                    
          PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.                                          
                                 DECISION ON APPEAL                                  
               This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the           
          examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 3, 5, 7 through             
          10, 12 through 15 and 17 through 19, which are all the claims              
          pending in the above-identified application.                               
               Claims 1 and 14 are representative of the subject matter on           
          appeal and read as follows:                                                





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007