Appeal No. 1999-0752 Application No. 08/806,103 drawings and the specifications in both the instant application and U.S. Patent No. 5,512,335 appears to indicate that the “means-plus-function” terms recited in the claims therein may be referring to the same fluid treatment device structures. Thus, upon return of this application, the examiner is to properly interpret the means-plus-function limitations in the claims of the instant application and U.S. Patent 5,512,335 consistent with Donaldson and determine whether such interpretation would have rendered the subject matter claimed in this application unpatentable over the claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,512,335 under statutory double patenting or judicially created obviousness-type double patenting. 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007