Ex Parte MILLER et al - Page 9



          Appeal No. 1999-0752                                                       
          Application No. 08/806,103                                                 

          drawings and the specifications in both the instant application            
          and U.S. Patent No. 5,512,335 appears to indicate that the                 
          “means-plus-function” terms recited in the claims therein may be           
          referring to the same fluid treatment device structures.                   
               Thus, upon return of this application, the examiner is to             
          properly interpret the means-plus-function limitations in the              
          claims of the instant application and U.S. Patent 5,512,335                
          consistent with Donaldson and determine whether such                       
          interpretation would have rendered the subject matter claimed in           
          this application unpatentable over the claims of U.S. Patent No.           
          5,512,335 under statutory double patenting or judicially created           
          obviousness-type double patenting.                                         













                                          9                                          




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007