The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 21 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte PATRICK J. FINN, ANTHONY J. FORMICOLA, JOSEPH R. BLASZAK, ROBERT M. FERGUSON and LAURENCE J. LYND __________ Appeal No. 1999-1002 Application No. 08/672,493 __________ ON BRIEF __________ Before GARRIS, LIEBERMAN, and PAWLIKOWSKI, Administrative Patent Judges. PER CURIAM. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of claims 17-26, 28-36 and 38-46, which are all the claims 1 1 We note the following informality is deserving of correction for claim 21, "the fuser roll" lacks antecedent basis 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007