Ex parte FINN et al. - Page 17




          Appeal No. 1999-1002                                                        
          Application No. 08/672,493                                                  


          circumstances of the use, which show the amount of control the              
          inventor retained over the invention.  See Moleculon Research               
          v. CBS, Inc., 793 F.2d 1261, 1265, 229 USPQ 805, 809 (Fed.                  
          Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1030 (1987).  In addition                
          to the “general understanding of the confidential nature of                 
          the testing”, the circumstances of the testing indicate that                
          the inventors maintained control over the invention.  The                   
          examiner is basing his rejection on speculation that                        
          confidentiality “may” have been compromised.  Absent any                    
          explanation or evidence, the examiner has failed to fulfill                 
          his initial burden of proving a case of public use more than                
          one year prior to the application filing date.                              
               The circumstances of the experimentation indicate that                 
          the experimentation was under the control of the inventors.                 
          The field test sites were secure from the public, allowing                  
          access only to field test facility users and Xerox                          
          technicians.  The users and technicians were under obligation               
          to report field test rolls performance to the inventors.  The               
          inventors conducted on site inspection of the experimental                  
          rolls every six weeks.  The inventor made provisions available              
          to return the test rolls after the experimentation was                      
          concluded and a number of rolls were to be returned to Xerox.               

                                          17                                          



Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007